Originally posted by: Bennett9000
Oh, you wanna geek with me, Fett? :evil:
That's exactly what I was talking about. The very mention of a cloaking device indicates its use in the Star Wars universe, if not necessarily in the film.
We are all hopeless nerds, aren't we? I'm going to quit before I lose all credibility here....
By the way, I hate Star Trek. :banhim:
But......
Your exact quote was "they used cloaking devices in Star Wars", which is not true. "Star Wars" is the name of a series of movies, thus you stated that cloaking devices were used in the movies, which they were not. We, the audience, never actually saw, or heard of, a cloaking device being used in the movies (up to this point). Therefore, your statement of cloaking devices being used in Star Wars was incorrect. I won't even go into the fact that you said "devices" plural, which means that we, the audience, would have had to see, or hear of, a cloaking device being used more than once in the the collective movie saga.
Sorry, I just enjoy doing that. Remember when we were kids and we would argue over issues in the movies, such as the three year long argument I had with my friends over the whole "Darth Vader being Lukes Father" issue. Back then it was more of a "is not----is too" type of argument. So the idea that I can, yet again, argue such silly issues, only this time having it an intelligent and well thought out argument. I just fine humor in silly things like that.
