![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Forum Issues Have an idea for / problem with the forums? Post here! |
|
|||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Emission Test Flunkee
|
I got to thinking it would be good to collect the more useful info from the forums and arrange it into a format that's easy to read. Moderators could maybe update relevant sections according to the latest forum activity. Any reason this is a bad idea? I found good, free software: ProjectForum Free Version
__________________
Roush Performance Suspension Nautilus Performance Stage 3 Turbo Kit
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Capital Curmudgeon
|
Re: NECO wiki?
Already considered and rejected. In fact, gamiller, you suggested it then, too.
![]() People don't even read the sticky threads - what makes you think they'd read a wiki? And I spend a significant portion of my time just watching the problems forum, I'm probably not going to be updating a wiki too. (Besides, when I see something common come up in the Problems forum, I usually add it to the FAQs at the top of the forum.)
__________________
1999 Cougar, Laser Red, 2.5L V6, MTX / 2004 Impala, Superior Blue, 3.4L V6, ATX / 1991 Airstream B190 7.5L V8
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
seller beware
|
Re: NECO wiki?
Yea, it was denied through yours (RJ) and FastCougars theories of it being such that it's the same as a FAQ or Sticky, when in reality, it seems as though most of the youth and close others have been leaning toward Wiki when faced with a question they cannot answer on their own.
But on the other hand, yes, it seems to be easier to just type in your question and hit "Post" to get an answer, than reading and searching through numerous pages of information, even when they do have the ability to use a search feature to refine the information they have to shuffle through. So, in retrospect, I think it wouldn't hurt to give it a try, but like stated before, it won't be fun keeping up the Sticky threads and the Wiki. Although you could just link the Wiki in the sticky thread, so you'll only have one place to keep up on. ![]() That's just my two cents.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||
|
NECO Member
|
Re: NECO wiki?
Quote:
![]() So let him keep asking! Maybe one day it will happen. ![]()
__________________
~Matt~ ND4SPD Army Kommandant ![]() Amanda and I has a penguin... somewhere. ![]() Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Calendar Lady
|
Re: NECO wiki?
I think it partly would be making it a noticeable part of the site... maybe I am giving people the benefit of the doubt, but I think 'most' people would use it if it was obvious and the content organized in a wikish way.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Capital Curmudgeon
|
Re: NECO wiki?
FWIW, I started working on one for my B-van site, though I never made it available to the public. I think it's in general a good idea but we need to be able to control who can edit it (we don't want the spam and abuse they can attract) and who has final say over what is actually correct ('99 alarm functionality, anyone?).
I guess it depends on what issue you're addressing. A large database of articles on Cougar maintenance and workings isn't a bad idea for those of us who are fairly knowledgeable but need more info in preparation for doing some work. But it's certainly not going to cut down on the "I have a miss in my engine and 150,000 miles on my spark plugs..." posts.
__________________
1999 Cougar, Laser Red, 2.5L V6, MTX / 2004 Impala, Superior Blue, 3.4L V6, ATX / 1991 Airstream B190 7.5L V8
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Calendar Lady
|
Re: NECO wiki?
Quote:
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||