NECO Forums

Go Back   NECO Forums > Modifications > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbos, supercharger, and Nitrous discussion and questions.

Sponsored Links: Want to make these ads disappear? Become a "Gold Member" or "Platinum Member" and they will!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-14-2003, 01:44 PM   #11 (permalink)
tomXR
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
turbo vs super

i just talked to atomic....he runs a 14.4 et on 9.5 psi. vortech has always made a very reliable s/c. i would also say they are much easier to install and to maintain. both turbos and s/c's are capable of maintaining reasonable mpg...if u can resist playing with your new power supply...unlikely.
Quote:
Turbo lag is really a thing of the past unless you are running a monster size turbo at high boost on a very low compression engine.
I hear this from you often. Not true. If there is no lag...there is no turbo. smaller turbos will have a lower boost threshold, less lag, and less torque increase. Turbo lag will never be a thing of the past as long as turbos are exhaust gas driven. whether its a half second or 3 seconds--when u apply full throttle, the time it takes for the exhaust velocity to increase to a point of spinning the turbine enough to produce noticable boost --is your turbo lag
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links: Want to make these ads disappear? Become a "Gold Member" or "Platinum Member" and they will!
Old 07-14-2003, 10:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
wavrdr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
turbo vs super

I run high 13's at 103 on 5psi....with the Street Flight kit. The turbo for our cars, makes more hp/tq throughout the entire rpm range in comparison to the only supercharger avaialbe for our cars(Centrifugal), so no need to compare the turbo to a roots system. If you want reliable daily driven power then go with the turbo. Yes it costs more, but you're getting a fully intercooled system with much nicer components...did I mention the intercooler?

As far as installation difficulty...I've read the Vortech install manual and have to say it looks much more diffcult than installing the turbo. You are required to relocate things such as the ac condensor, shim the fans shroud IIRC, not to mention the battery(both kits require batt. reloc.). The turbo is a full bolt-on kit, comes with a fully tuned chip, and makes a ton more "overall" power.....
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2003, 09:56 PM   #13 (permalink)
95Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
turbo vs super

The Vortech installation is no biggie as long as you have the tools. There are just about 10 or so one to two hour projects to complete. I did it in one and a half days with my dad and brother in law. I personally think the turbo would be harder just for the fact that you have to yank off the exhaust manifolds. Just replacing the o2 sensor in the rear one was a b*tch let alone taking out the rusty-ass bolts.

As far as which to get, it all depends. If you are buying new, then go for the turbo. I would only choose the Vortech if you buy it used (from someone reputable) like I did. The turbo gives you more torque, new headers and an intercooler. In the summertime the vortech power is still better than stock, but it is not too impressive. On a cool night or in the winter it does screem though. I would say get the intercooler for the vortech, but even then if you're buying new that would put you right around the price of a turbo anyway. For the price I got on mine I couldn't be happier.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2003, 10:47 PM   #14 (permalink)
T3/T4 60-1
Moderator
 
PuckPuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Windsor
Posts: 8,045
turbo vs super

Quote:
Originally posted by: tomXR
i just talked to atomic....he runs a 14.4 et on 9.5 psi. vortech has always made a very reliable s/c. i would also say they are much easier to install and to maintain. both turbos and s/c's are capable of maintaining reasonable mpg...if u can resist playing with your new power supply...unlikely.
Quote:
Turbo lag is really a thing of the past unless you are running a monster size turbo at high boost on a very low compression engine.
I hear this from you often. Not true. If there is no lag...there is no turbo. smaller turbos will have a lower boost threshold, less lag, and less torque increase. Turbo lag will never be a thing of the past as long as turbos are exhaust gas driven. whether its a half second or 3 seconds--when u apply full throttle, the time it takes for the exhaust velocity to increase to a point of spinning the turbine enough to produce noticable boost --is your turbo lag

true turbos will always have lag... but nowadays that lag is down to less than a 1/10th of a second... so it will still produce power quicker than a s/c
__________________
USED TO HAVE: 3.0L, PnP heads, N2O, and a few other run of the mill mods.
WILL HAVE: 3.0L, PnP Heads, T3/T4 Turbo, N2O, and a few more run of the mill mods. - I want 12s

"The Chair" Equipped, world's most comfortable Cougar rear seat - guaranteed.
PuckPuck.Com
PuckPuck is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2003, 06:50 PM   #15 (permalink)
NECO Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,122
RE:turbo vs super

from what i know and understand is that there really isnt a better one. there is only a better choice for your needs/wants. the way i look at it is like this.. i want some more power and torque( i will admit that im a torque junkie) and with out going into great detail i am going to be choosing the s/c for a few reasons.. granted street flgiht might have a great turbo kit. having seen it first hand ., i just didnt like the look of the kit as welll as the price. for almost 2 grand less i can get just about as much hps/ftlbs . so far its pointing me in the s/c direction. then i look at vortech who have been in the game for many many years and have done alot for the ford mustangs and have a pretty good customer service dept.( have made a bunch of calls and asked alot of them and they were still very informative and helpful). but to cut to the chase. im going to the vortech s/c for a safer investment, better looking system , that wont completly put me into permenate debt. and has been proven and has been out for a while.. but to reiterate the fact that its pretty much all part of your personal choice . i have a 95 gst eclipse turbo and i love it as well . but really i like the FI feeling so i dont really have a loyalty to turbo. or s/c
__________________
"Oh yes , yes by all means turn me into a child star,,,, Perhaps I can move to Cali forn ia and wrangle me a three way with the Olson Twins!" Thanks stewy

"I take life a quarter mile at a time"
" does that mean your life is longer than most ??"
"yeah 17.5 seconds!"
Knibbs is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2003, 07:06 PM   #16 (permalink)
NECO Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 318
RE: turbo vs super

Personally I think an Eaton/Roots type S/C would be excellent for Duratec. Keep boost around say 5 psi and I think it could give a broad tourque curve with maybe 220-240 FWHP on a mildly modded SVT with reasonable non-intercooled IATs..nice and simple without special headers/intercoolers etc. This is about as far as I would want with stock internals and 10:1 CR and you will be less likely to shread trannys/half shafts if you are careful and have a Quaife. The turbo is great but its a big expensive project and without alot of other driveline/chassis/suspension upgrades to allow putting the power down I bet it will not be much faster. I like what I have read about the kit that Jagular is working on..crank driven (no jackshaft), and attached to a modded 3L UIM for install simplicity for about 3K..Hope it works out...
__________________
99 Amazon Green CSVT #554/2760
Some I/E mods
179.2 FWHP @ 6900 RPM @ sounds like a Porsche
DanN is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 02:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
NECO Member
 
Raben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,295
RE:turbo vs super

Just from a general point of view, it would depend on what you want to get out of it. I've always considered Superchargers = daily driven and limited strip use. . .and turbos for both daily driven and limited strip to all out racing.

Not sure the power ratings on cougars as I have been out of it for so long, but on the LS1's I can get a turbo kit that's able to dish out up to 1,000hp. It all depends on what you want to do with your car. And how much money you have because it's not all about the turbo alone, forged internals, rebuild tranny, on a rear wheel driven car, the rear end will need work, etc etc. The higher HP/TQ rateing you want, the more $$ you are going to need to fix the weak parts of the car.



I'm going for a CAS twin turbo setup with both set to 3psi to start with. The stock LS1 can take up to 8psi, roughly 450rwhp but anything above that then I'll need to work the tranny, upgrade to a 12 bolt rear end and forged pistons, and a stronger crank shaft + drive shaft.


My goal is to eventually hit 800rwhp but I have a LONG way to go. Right now I'm satisified with my 316hp 348lbs of torque that's nearly constantly on the wheels under WOT due to my stall and tuning.

Once my car is paid for (cough cough, 4 1/2 more years) then I'll really tear this car apart hehe.

Good luck to everyone that is going boosted/blown.
__________________
1995 Dodge Neon -- Beater and paid for
1999 Trans AM -- Sold but not forgotten
2000 Grand Jeep Cherokee Laredo
------------------------


I was so poor growing up ... if I wasn't a boy ... I'd have had
nothing to play with.
Raben is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2003, 04:58 AM   #18 (permalink)
MetalJim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
RE:turbo vs super

Quote:
Originally posted by: DanN
Personally I think an Eaton/Roots type S/C would be excellent for Duratec. Keep boost around say 5 psi..
One problem with a S/C is that once you decide on a boost level you're pretty much locked in - before you even install it. With a turbo, you can boost to your hearts content. Hit detonation - pull it back a smidge.
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2003, 08:50 PM   #19 (permalink)
NECO Member
 
warmonger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 776
RE:turbo vs super

The turbo kills the vortech S/C hands down. The only thing they have in common is peak numbers.
The centrifugal driven supercharger is not going to help produce low-rpm torque if you or anyone is a torque junkie. It is progressive with max boost arriving late in the power band. This kind of S/C is ideal for a motor that already produces big torque at low rpm at the expense of high rpm torque.

Our motors are the opposite.

The vortech on a 2.5L produces maybe 200-210 Ft-lbs or torque and only around 5000 rpm. The turbo makes anywhere from 225-275 ft-lbs of torque depending on boost level and it does it from as little as 3000 rpm to 6000 rpm.
Flat torque equals big power numbers and and massive thrust.

Sorry but the vortech kit is only halfway there for more than half the money.
__________________
My project website
Nautilus Performance We are now an authorized SCT Dealer![SIGPIC]
warmonger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2003, 10:35 PM   #20 (permalink)
NECO Member
Platinum Member
 
nadthomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Grove City, OH
Posts: 3,276
RE:turbo vs super

Dude Gonzo, your using a pic of my car for your icon. I'm honored I guess, but don't go starting any trouble around here, I don't want my photo to get a bad rep.


Thanks,
Dan
__________________

2004 5.7L M6 Black GTO - K&N CAI - 18" TSW Indy 500 Staggered - Diablo Tune
2006 2.0T DSG Candy White VW GTI - K&N Drop-In - Headlight Eyelids
Silver Frost Roush Cougar - Rio Red Cougar
There is life after the Cougar, but the fast lane can be such a lonely place.

Quote:
Originally Posted by B3NN3TT View Post
You need some side skirts like a hobo needs a sammich...
nadthomas is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Sponsored Links: Want to make these ads disappear? Become a "Gold Member" or "Platinum Member" and they will!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5