View Full Version : ATX 00 Cougar vs. 94 Mustang..
Tuy3n
04-25-2002, 12:34 AM
Alright guys, i need some advice. Before i drag this dumb **** kid (who swears just because his car has stripes and is manual) thinks he has the fastest car around the neighborhood. His car looks like crap and has more stickers than a "TYPE R Tercel" and "86 Corolla GT". Anyways, he thinks hes a big shot because he beats all the ricers around my block. I think I can take him. His car is stock except for the dual exhaust he got. My car is stock also..what are my chances? If i do lose, I will still probably kick his puny ass for talking ****. His arms are about the size of my penis. ;)
Tubaboy
04-25-2002, 10:50 AM
Is his mustang a V6, GT, MT, AT? Details will help.
But in most cases he'll probably be you in a drag.
Paul
sonza68
04-25-2002, 11:43 AM
It also depends if you are an ATX or MTX. Those Mustang 6s were putting out the whopping 150 hp and the GT's were at 215.
Phantom
04-25-2002, 03:56 PM
Your Coug is ATX, his Stang is MTX... even if it was a V6 I think he could probably beat you. A MTX Cougar can beat a MTX V6 Stang... but not sure about the ATX. And especially not if its a GT
Tuy3n
04-25-2002, 05:09 PM
well..i have an ATX..and he has MTX. But it isn't a GT though. I will still probably drag him. If he lose, I'll just have to beat him up ;)
Faboo
04-25-2002, 09:12 PM
His arms are about the size of my penis. ;) his arms must be nearly invisible, practically not there eh?? haha
tomXR
04-26-2002, 12:13 AM
well its gotta be a v6 since it didnt come stock with a dual exhuast.
edit: nvm...didnt see Tuy3n second post...
Frank
04-26-2002, 06:42 AM
'94 Ford Mustang V6 5-speed: 0-60 9.9, 1/4 mile 17.3. Sounds like a stock ATX Cougar could take one.
BigKat
04-26-2002, 04:15 PM
that's pitiful.
according to those stats, my dad's 00 ATX Altima GLE can take on a 94 MTX Stang V6 :rolleyes:
ToBeHuman
05-08-2002, 03:11 AM
Damn, i didn't know those older Mustangs were that slow. Crazy. I don't know about Mustangs... what kind of V6 engine does a 94 have? 3.0 or 3.8 liter? OHV?
Who won?
NorCalCoug
05-08-2002, 04:20 AM
I can't speak for the 94, but most of the 80's and early 90's Fords with a V6 used the 232-cubic inch 3.8L V6.. I know my T-bird had like a whopping 130hp or something on that V6.. :) Enough torque to still break my damn engine mounts though. Twice. ;)
im a huge mustang fan and cant understand why the hell anyone would buy one that doesnt have a v8. whats the point?
Furious1
05-10-2002, 09:54 AM
...cant understand why the hell anyone would buy one that doesnt have a v8. whats the point?
I've always felt that way too, but I'm sure people have their reasons.
the only reason i can see is to save on insurance, but then why are you buying that kind of car. im just glad they at least got rid of those 4 cylinders.
SovKhan
05-15-2002, 12:19 AM
99+ had a different intake manifold they get 190, but still arnt horribly fast. for a 3,200+ pound car