svt cams vs 3.0 cams

View Poll Results: SVT cams or 3.0 cams?

Voters
13. You may not vote on this poll
  • SVT

    4 30.77%
  • 3.0

    9 69.23%
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

  1. #1
    NECO Member mmc757's Avatar
    Join Date
    2010 May
    Location
    Norwich, CT
    Posts
    1,565

    svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    svt cams in a 3.0 build...Worth the $ and trouble or no? Assume the heads are going to be rebuilt anyway, and a tune will be done as soon as the swap is done.
    Klaatu barada nikto

  2. Remove Advertisements
    NewCougar.org
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    3L Install Maestro Gold MemberModerator Blackcoog's Avatar
    Join Date
    2000 Oct
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    7,473

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    If you are doing the work I'd go with SVT cams. If you are paying for it then it depends. It also depends on what you will be doing with the car. I suppose you could say 3.0L would be better for daily driving because the power is lower in the RPM range and it would be more usable. If you are shooting for the highest hp you can get then you would probably want to go with the SVT cams.
    Visit: 3LDuratec.com for a prepped 3L ready to drop in!

    Click here to see my Cougar.


  4. #3
    NECO Member BlackBetty's Avatar
    Join Date
    2006 Feb
    Location
    Lethbridge, Alberta
    Posts
    7,246

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    Isn't there a difference between the cams in the later 3L's vs earlier 3L's as well?

    Like blackcoog was saying what are you going to be using the car for?

    Sold-1999 3.0L Mercury Cougar- Cougardb // Cardomain // Fuelly
    New- 2011 Ford Fusion Sport AWD- CAI&tune. Fuelly//Cardomain

  5. #4
    3L Install Maestro Gold MemberModerator Blackcoog's Avatar
    Join Date
    2000 Oct
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    7,473

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    I think the 01-03 3L cams are slightly different than the 04+ 3L cams.
    Visit: 3LDuratec.com for a prepped 3L ready to drop in!

    Click here to see my Cougar.


  6. #5
    NECO Member mmc757's Avatar
    Join Date
    2010 May
    Location
    Norwich, CT
    Posts
    1,565

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    -03 Escape motor
    -Doing my own work
    -very reasonable price for the hardware
    -unlikely that I'll ever see a dragstrip, usually drive pretty responsibly but would appreciate the ability to surprise people. Pretty much never drive at speeds greater than 80 mph, but lots of highway time.
    Klaatu barada nikto

  7. #6
    3 wheelin Lifetime Platinum MemberModerator jaged's Avatar
    Join Date
    2003 Mar
    Location
    hebron, in
    Posts
    19,030

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    then stay with the 3L cams, you will love the low to midrange power

    sponsored by rambo graphix

    '01 2.5 mtx "workhorse"
    '99 3L AutoX
    '08 Mustang Bullitt #5389 4/12/13 sold to B3NN3TT

  8. #7
    TZT Performance Gold MemberModerator Turbo Zetec Tour's Avatar
    Join Date
    2007 Sep
    Location
    Louisville, Kentucky
    Posts
    3,116

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    Quote Originally Posted by jaged View Post
    then stay with the 3L cams, you will love the low to midrange power
    I would actually stay with the 3L cams and do a full 3L. since the car should be tuned anyways, you might as well make the most of the oval ports and 3L cams. If its tuned right the power doesnt really fall off at the top and the low/midrange is just great.
    Daniel - TZT Performance
    '93 Mitsu 3000GT VR4 - 230K miles and counting
    2000 Black SVTC #391 - sold
    '97 Contour GL Tutrbo - sent to the crusher Jan 09

  9. #8
    3 wheelin Lifetime Platinum MemberModerator jaged's Avatar
    Join Date
    2003 Mar
    Location
    hebron, in
    Posts
    19,030

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    i liked the full 3l with 3l cams of my car vs the 3l w/ svt uim and svt that i drove. mine pulled all the way through, vs just on the top end

    sponsored by rambo graphix

    '01 2.5 mtx "workhorse"
    '99 3L AutoX
    '08 Mustang Bullitt #5389 4/12/13 sold to B3NN3TT

  10. #9
    NECO Member BlackBetty's Avatar
    Join Date
    2006 Feb
    Location
    Lethbridge, Alberta
    Posts
    7,246

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    Like the others said, I'd go with 3L cams as well. I drive mine daily and it's great, I also hit the highway for 1.5-2hr's about once a week. I don't have any experience with the SVT cams so I can't give a great comparison but the 3L cams do well.

    Sold-1999 3.0L Mercury Cougar- Cougardb // Cardomain // Fuelly
    New- 2011 Ford Fusion Sport AWD- CAI&tune. Fuelly//Cardomain

  11. #10
    NECO Member Badazzcougar's Avatar
    Join Date
    2004 Mar
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
    Posts
    1,680

    Re: svt cams vs 3.0 cams

    My experience with svt cams is both in my 2.5L and a full 3.0l that I have of a buddy of mine,if your already that far do it, I personally like where the power band is after an svt cam swap, when I put them in my 2.5 it woke that motor up obviously the blower helps with that too,but the power band is great. In the full 3.0L svt cammed vehicle it still has plenty of low end snort and its not even dialed in completely. I think alot of the power differences is more in the intake you use wether it be split port with IMRC or oval port. With my car at a stop it feels like there is a slight lag till the secondaries open then its nutz where as the full 3.0L is nutz as soon as you hit the gas. Good luck

    • Vortech Supercharger • TruBendz Exhaust • MSDS Headers • 2.62" Pulley on Blower • Torsen • Spec 3+ • Fidanza...
    Can you say Torque Steer?! Now on a full 3L

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1