Thread: Monster 3L Dyno
View Single Post
Old 04-08-2008, 07:16 PM   #26 (permalink)
SpookSVT
NECO Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 455
Re: Monster 3L Dyno

Quote:
Originally Posted by Habcougar View Post
Thanks for your input.I was forgetting that I will be using split port manifolds so svt cams will be more suitable from what I read.I haven't decided about the heads though.The higher CR sounds nice but is it really worth the work is what I'm wondering since 3.0L's are already 10:1 with oval heads.
It shouldn't matter which port style you use SVT cams with when not using the 2.5L UIM (like you shouldn't unless properly modified, which raises more issues anyway).

The twin port Taurus UIM no longer has the bifurcation between runners so it is a shared port but still allows the use of the IMRC for lowspeed cylinder filling. So there really is no benefit as far as dual runner acoustical tuning either way unless you use the 2.5L UIM (which is inadequete).

Hybrids have a fouled up combustion chamber and could use some work but the return may not be practical for the amount invested. The higher CR can work against you at high engine speeds and puts more stress on parts.

I'd just as well use a late model engine unless you want to spend the money for an electric water pump and still use the twin ports with IMRC.
__________________
98' SVT Contour 3L - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/678557
00' Focus ZX3 - AWD, 3.5L project car - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2625400/1

Last edited by SpookSVT; 04-08-2008 at 08:21 PM.
SpookSVT is offline   Reply With Quote