NECO Forums - View Single Post

nandalora · 08-28-2006, 12:29 PM

Fastcougar: I'm not argueing the use of IMRC, I am argueing how you said they used VCT in the 2.0L and how they were too cheap to put it on the 2.5L. We got IMRC and that is way better. The VCT on the 2.0L is no where near the technology of the VVT in the Mazda 6. That's a more useful form.

Warmonger: You had IMRC working on your turbo 3.0L, correct? If so, did you change the secondary's opening point to match the turbo application better?

08-28-2006, 12:29 PM	#17 (permalink)
nandalora NECO Member Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Clarkston, MI Posts: 625	Re: tuning with/or out secondaries Fastcougar: I'm not argueing the use of IMRC, I am argueing how you said they used VCT in the 2.0L and how they were too cheap to put it on the 2.5L. We got IMRC and that is way better. The VCT on the 2.0L is no where near the technology of the VVT in the Mazda 6. That's a more useful form. Warmonger: You had IMRC working on your turbo 3.0L, correct? If so, did you change the secondary's opening point to match the turbo application better? __________________ 2007 Black Mica Mazdaspeed6 GT- My new love